Identify the perfect franchise for you! Take our short quiz Take our free franchise quiz!
Identify the perfect franchise for you! Take our short quiz Take our free franchise quiz!

Common Mistakes Made By the Franchisor Buyer During the Due Diligence Investigation

Common Franchise Buying Mistakes - Traffic Sign - Franchise Help

Franchise merger and acquisition talks always start with the best of intentions. After all, a well-executed franchise system merger can lead to enhanced scale (for increased buying power and leverage over suppliers), reduction of overhead and operating costs (through elimination of duplicate staff, departments, and locations), and increased revenue (through cross-selling of products or services, optimization of distribution channels, and bolstered brand recognition and standing in the eyes of prospective franchisees).

In this post, contributor and Jones Day Partner Andrew Sherman outlines some of the top mistakes that franchise executives tend to make when evaluating a potential merger or acquisition transaction. Read up, dear franchise executive, and perhaps you will avoid making these same costly mistakes yourself.

Despite all the potential benefits of a successful franchise merger or acquisition, a bad franchise M&A deal -- often caused by a lack of appropriate pre-deal due diligence -- can lead to extensive value destruction or even total disaster (see: Wendy's / Arby's and Popeyes / Church's). Unfortunately, many franchisors, spurred on by fee-hungry wall street investment bankers or just their own lust for announcing a blockbuster deal, rush into merger and acquisition frenzy without knowing exactly what to look for in a prospective acquisition or merger target.

Here is a list of common mistakes to avoid when considering any franchise system merger or acquisition deal:

  • Mismatching information and personnel: A buyer should make sure that the documents provided by the seller are reviewed by the right members of his or her team.Perhaps the seller has particularly complex financial statements or highly technical reports that must be truly understood by the buyer’s due diligence team. Make sure there is a capability fit. Once a deal has closed, a buyer has little recourse or chance of recovery if bad facts emerge about the seller's business that were disclosed in the documents the seller furnished during the pre-deal due diligence process. Leave no document unexamined!
  • Poor communication and misunderstandings: Communication between the deal evaluation teams of the buyer and the seller should be open and clear. This process must be well orchestrated to avoid misunderstandings or accusations of misrepresentation down the road. Oftentimes investment bankers are brought in to facilitate any M&A (mergers and acquisitions) discussions; as deal-making and deal negotiation specialists, investment bankers can be a very useful resource in the deal process. Their experience managing complex financial transactions can help make the deal proceed extremely smoothly. However, even when investment bankers are retained, it's critical that key decision-makers for both the buyer and seller stay personally involved in the deal discussions and understand the meaning of any communications, verbal or written, that are sent back and forth during the due diligence and negotiation periods.
  • Lack of planning and focus: In the preparation of the due diligence questionnaires and in interviews with the selling franchisor's team, planning and focus are key concerns. The focus must be on asking the right questions, not just a lot of them. Sellers will resent wasteful fishing expeditions when the buyer’s team is unfocused. At best, unfocused due diligence requests and questioning will waste both buyer and seller time and communicate to the seller that the buyer may not be particularly savvy about the key drivers of the seller's business. At worst, unfocused requests will cause the seller to break off negotiations in favor of remaining independent or in favor of a more efficient and organized buyer. Bottom line: there should be a clear fit between the questions asked and the compelling strategic rationale underlying the transaction.
  • Inadequate time devoted to tax and financial matters: The buyer’s (and seller’s) CFO and CPA must play an integral part in the due diligence process in order to gather data on past financial performance and tax reporting, unusual financial events, or disturbing trends or inefficiencies. No deal, no matter how news-worthy, can work if the numbers don't work.
  • Being mistreated by the seller: The buyer must insist that its team will be treated like welcome guests, not as spies from the enemy camp. Many times the buyer’s counsel is sent to a dark room in the corner of the building to inspect documents without coffee, windows, or phones. Providing reasonable accommodations and support for the buyer’s due diligence team enhances and expedites the transaction. If a virtual data room / electronic data room (where critical financial records and other corporate documents are uploaded for inspection by potential buyers) is not provided to the buyer, the seller should at least make utilizing the physical data room a pleasant and efficient experience.
  • Failure to examine intangible factors: Many deals fail because of a lack of a shared vision or conflicting corporate cultures. The franchisor’s due diligence must include a process for measuring the likelihood that the two cultures and systems will ultimately fit after the post. Many initially promising franchise mergers fall apart post-deal because of cultural integration issues. Don't fall victim to this trap: take the time to truly understand the differences in culture and attitude between the two entities being combined.

Andrew J. Sherman is a Partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Jones Day, with over 2,500 attorneys worldwide. Mr. Sherman is a recognized international authority on the legal and strategic issues affecting small and growing companies. Mr. Sherman is an Adjunct Professor in the Masters of Business Administration (MBA) program at the University of Maryland and Georgetown University where he has taught courses on business growth, capital formation and entrepreneurship for over twenty-three (23) years. Mr. Sherman is the author of twenty-one (21) books on the legal and strategic aspects of business growth and capital formation. His eighteenth (18th) book, Road Rules Be the Truck. Not the Squirrel. ( is an inspirational book which was published in the Fall of 2008. Mr.Sherman can be reached at 202-879-3686 or e-mail

4 Business Functions Changing to Reflect Social Networking and Learning

Consumer social networking sites are not only transforming how people live their daily lives, they are also influencing several business-related functions. More and more of these socially-enabled tools, platforms, and best practices are fundamentally changing the way companies handle data, manage customers, and perform market research. Businesses can harness the power of socially-enabled tools that promote collaboration and eliminate departmental boundaries that might inhibit innovation. We aren’t talking about the need for small business to have and manage their own social media accounts. At this point, such initiatives should be a given. The focus is on ways social sharing is altering business processes at a core level, transforming how people “work.”

Why More Men are Investing in Women’s Gyms

FranchiseHelp sat down with the next generation of that fitness legacy, Lucille Roberts President Kevin Roberts. Kevin discusses his mothers impact on the company and why the women's fitness niche continues to grow at a rapid pace. Kevin also gives insight on what it takes to be a good candidate to own a Lucille Roberts Women's Fitness gym franchise.

Why I Have an Issue with the Forbes Franchise Rankings

The 5-Year Growth Rate and 5-Year Franchise Continuity are both great independent metrics of how a franchise is doing on average. As a potential franchisee both of these statistics are vital for selecting a franchise - you want to select a franchise that will provide you with a high return on investment and which will survive in the long run. I think these are, as FRANdata and Forbes suggested, two of the biggest (if not the two biggest) and most obvious metrics for whether or not a franchise is a “good” opportunity for a franchisee. But how do you use these to determine which franchise is BEST? This is the fundamental difficulty in coming up with a ranking system - it isn’t the difficulty in separating the good from the meh from the bad - it’s separating the great from the good and the best from the great. In the case of these rankings I found it to be pretty difficult to comprehend how they differentiated between the top ranked franchises. For instance, if you look at the difference between Discover Map (Forbes #4), Just Between Friends (Forbes #5), & Seniors Helping Seniors (Forbes #6) they all have extremely close continuity ratings and substantially different growth rates. In fact, in the case of these three, the overall rankings are opposite the growth rate rankings. Seniors Helping Seniors is ranked at the bottom of these three franchises despite having a growth rate that is 31 percentage points higher than Discovery Map and a continuity that is only 2 percentage points lower. This suggested to me that continuity was viewed as the dominant factor. But that logic didn’t hold for the rest on the “Economy Class” Top 10, as BrightStar Care (Forbes #7) had the same growth rate as Pop-a-Lock (Forbes #8) but a continuity rate that was 12 percentage points lower. These comparisons show that these were not the only two factors that went into the rankings, which is understandable, but no other factors that are explicitly listed in their results seem to be major factors.