What Happens When a Franchise Contract Ends? Obligations Upon Termination
Whether you are an active franchisee, successful franchisor, or someone looking for franchise opportunities, something you no doubt are concerned with is what happens at the end of the franchise contract (hint: if you aren’t, you should be). Examine four of the biggest fundamental concerns arising from the termination of a franchise relationship.
De-Branding (and Re-Branding)
It is no secret that franchisors spend substantial sums of money to develop and protect their trademarks (and trade dress, in the case of restaurants and retail outlets). So, it should come as no surprise that franchisors take the end of a franchisee’s tenure very seriously. Most franchise agreements require “immediate” de-branding following termination of the franchise contract.
De-branding covers things like removing (or at least temporarily covering) signage, changing paint colors, ceasing use of uniforms, and other affiliation-erasing duties. However, in this day and age, de-branding requirements typically extend much further into online “property,” and include things like stopping the use of company email addresses and social media activity as a franchisee. While most franchise agreements prohibit franchisees from acquiring branded accounts (e.g., @Franchise_of_DC), tweets and status updates referencing the franchise are likely required to stop, and old posts probably need to be deleted.
Ownership of Phone Numbers
The franchise agreement should also address who gets to use the franchisee’s phone numbers after the franchise agreement expires. Traditionally, this right has belonged to the franchisor, but with home-based businesses becoming the norm, franchisors that allowed franchisees to use their home phones or existing cell phone numbers might have an issue regaining control of this component of their former franchisees’ business presence.
Ownership of Customer Lists
Another critical issue that arises upon termination of a franchise relationship is determining which party (or parties) get to keep the franchised outlet’s customer list. Even in the presence of a non-compete agreement, the customer list is still a valuable asset to the former franchisee. Non-solicitation provisions typically carve out solicitations for non-competitive businesses, so a former franchisee’s access to its old customer list can help jump start a post-franchise business venture. Of course, the franchisor also has an interest in maintaining control of the customer list—particularly if they plan to take over the location or find a substitute franchisee.
Where permitted (as some states do not enforce them), non-competition provisions are significant for both the former franchisee and the franchisor following termination of the franchise relationship. In the absence of a non-compete agreement, re-branding of the former franchisee becomes absolutely essential for the franchisor, and the “immediate” compliance obligation is likely to be strictly enforced. When a non-compete obligation is in effect, the franchisee needs to begin planning from the outset what their next move will be after the franchise relationship ends.
As these four points demonstrate, the termination of a franchise agreement should be as well-thought out as the start of a franchise business. For franchisees, failure to negotiate reasonable post-termination rights can have devastating effects as a small business. For franchisors, neglecting to impose and adequately enforce appropriate post-termination restrictions can result in massive headaches, loss of brand control, and prolonged and costly litigation.
Jeff Fabian is a franchise and trademark lawyer who represents both start-up and active franchisors. He can be reached at 866.545.7859, or online at www.fabianlegal.com. You can also follow Jeff on Twitter @jsfabian.
This article is provided for informational purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice.
What is a Franchise? The FH Franchise Primer
Contrary to popular opinion, franchising extends far beyond food and retail. In recent years, franchises have become popular for the services sector and manufacturing sector as well. The US Census shows that in 2007, franchises alone accounted for $1.3 trillion of sales.
The American Dream is NOT Out of Reach!
In the definition of the American Dream by James Truslow Adams in 1931, "life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement" regardless of social class or circumstances of birth.
Why Franchisors Don’t Like Negotiating
The first impression that the franchisee gets from reading the franchise agreement is total incomprehension, unless they are well versed in legal terminologies and phrasing. The FDD is required to be in plain English but the franchise agreement has no such requirement. Typically, the franchisor’s legal department works extremely hard to secure the franchisor’s position through the Agreement and makes it impenetrable for someone who is not a lawyer to understand. The uniform nature of the agreement for all franchisees makes it assumed that the franchisee must sign the agreement so that all the franchisees follow the same terms. Even though that is partially true, the franchisee can plead their case and negotiate terms where they believe that they are offering something unique to the franchisor.