4 Signs a Franchisor May Not Be Around for the Long Haul
A critical part of the due diligence process for prospective franchisees is trying to discern (to the extent reasonably possible) whether the franchisor will be around for the long haul. After all, much of what you pay for in a franchise opportunity is the right to be associated with the franchisor’s brand and system, the right to use the franchisor’s proprietary materials, and in some cases, the right to an exclusive territory. If the franchisor goes out of business, all of these rights go up in the air (if not out the window), and you may well be left in a worse position than if you had just gone into business on your own in the first place.
So, what are some signs that a franchisor might not be around for the long haul?
Solvency
Solvency is one important factor, although insolvent franchisors can be (and are) successful, and even solvent franchisors may not be sufficiently “successful” in the minds of the owners to sustain maintenance of the franchise system. If the franchisor is undergoing frequent financial restructuring, or if it doesn’t appear to be doing anything to improve its financial condition, this may be a sign of trouble on the horizon.
The franchisor’s recent financial statements should be included in Item 21 of the Franchise Disclosure Document, and these should be the starting point for evaluating its financial condition.
Sustainability
Is the franchised concept a recent fad? Is the franchised concept behind the times? In either case, it is worth asking whether the business model is likely to be around for the long haul. People love frozen yogurt now (or at least they did a year or two ago), but was that the case five years ago? Will it be the case five years from now?
On the other side, if the franchisor is not making efforts to keep the concept relevant, or if its model simply becomes outdated, these may also be signs of trouble to come.
Other Interests
If the franchisor’s owners have other business interests, this too can be a potential warning sign—though certainly not always so. Now here I am not talking about the major conglomerates, but serial developers who build a franchise system to make some money, but soon will be ready to move on to the next big thing. Whether they get bored and just try to fade into the shadows to let the system “run itself,” or whether they sell the system to new owners unfamiliar with the concept, in either case this can lead to troubled times for the system’s franchisees.
Disappearing Franchisees
Finally, even if everything else appears in order but the number of franchisees is shrinking rather than growing, this too can be a sign of systemic concerns. If franchisees are exiting the system at a clip, prospective franchisees need to find out why this is the case. This may be a symptom of one of the factors noted above, or it may be a sign of other problems in the franchise system. Either way, this can cause significant harm to the system as a whole, the reputation of the brand, and potentially the resale value of your franchised outlet.
Prospective franchisees need to critically evaluate these and other risks in proposed franchise opportunities, and make sure that they make an informed decision before moving forward with a franchise purchase.
Importantly, no one factor will be determinative across the board, and a franchisor who exhibits some or all of these signs won’t necessarily be unsustainable. Like the rest of the franchise due diligence process, analyzing these signs should be part of a broader qualitative and quantitative review of the franchise opportunity.
This article is provided for informational purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice.
Jeff Fabian is a lawyer who represents prospective franchisees in evaluating and negotiating new franchise opportunities. Jeff also represents franchisors in franchise compliance and trademark matters. Visit www.fabianlegal.com for more information, and follow Jeff on Twitter @jsfabian.
The Financially Distressed Franchisee
In dealing with an individual distressed franchisee, the following questions need to be asked:
Franchise Disclosure Documents For Dummies – Part 1
To begin my new weekly column for FranchiseHelp.com I will be writing a series of articles covering some basics and need-to-know information for each of the twenty-three Items of the Franchise Disclosure Document (“FDD”). I will try to be as non-technical as possible, and will try to provide insight and information that is useful for both franchisors and prospective franchisees. Nine weeks from now, you may have a slightly better understanding of the core elements of the FDD.
Know Before you Go – Non-Compete Provisions in Franchise Agreements
In general, non-compete provisions state that the franchisee will not, during the term of the franchise agreement and for a reasonable period thereafter (typically two or three years), own or be involved in any “competitive business.” What constitutes a “competitive business” will vary from franchise system to franchise system, but most franchisees can generally expect to be prohibited from taking part in any business that offers goods/services that are either identical to or competitive with the goods/services offered under the franchise system. Non-compete provisions must be limited in geographic scope, and generally cover a set radius (usually somewhere around 5 to 25 miles) around the former franchised outlet, and possibly also the outlets of other existing franchisees.
