2016 United States of Franchising
In the past 12 months, over 5.4 million people have visited FranchiseHelp.com, the internet’s leading resource on becoming a franchisee. Given the sheer volume of Americans seeking information about franchising from us, we’re in a unique position to look at how this breaks down across the nation.
At the highest level, there are a few conclusions that are impossible to ignore:
- The South is not only the center of franchising in the U.S., but the differences between the South and the rest of the country have only gotten bigger. With the exception of Nevada, 11 of the top 12 states in terms of franchise interest are all contiguous across the South and Mid-Atlantic.
- Georgia is on my mind! (And the minds of franchises hopefully…) The new champion of franchising is the Peach State. After coming in 3rd in last year’s rankings, Georgia leapfrogged Florida and Texas to take the top spot this year.
- Nevada and Colorado continue to impress in spite of their geographic location. These two states are the lone centers of relatively positive franchise interest in the Western United States.
Without further ado, here’s the 2016 United States of Franchising.
State by State Rankings
Let’s start with a look at how states compare to each other in terms of their interest in franchising. The more green the state, the more people in that state are interested relative to that state’s population.
(If you’re interested in the methodology for our analysis, scroll down.)
Each state’s relative interest in owning a franchise:
As we mentioned above, interest in franchising in the U.S. is dominated by the South, specifically Georgia, Texas, Florida, and Louisiana. It is interesting to note that this year only 15 out of 50 states have a positive relative interest.
2015 vs. 2016 Ranking Changes
One of the most surprising thing about this year’s analysis was how much certain states moved in the rankings. When you compare last year’s rankings to this year, here are the changes:
Fairly unsurprisingly, you see the majority of the big movement amongst the states toward to bottom of the rankings. States like Idaho, Kansas, and Alaska saw major jumps while West Virginia and Massachusetts fell quite significantly.
Of the more noteworthy risers, you see Bible Belt states Alabama, Tennessee, and Mississippi each rise fairly significantly. As mentioned. franchise interest is polarizing towards the South even more.
Of the most noteworthy fallers, California and New Jersey both suffered quite a bit. Given how populous each of those states are, that type of fall is something that franchisors looking to expand in those states should be quite concerned about.
2016 Absolute Franchise Interest
Just because a state has low relative interest doesn’t mean people there don’t want to open franchises. Here is the absolute interest in franchising by state:
It’s truly shocking to see that only 8 states account for almost 53% of the country’s total interest in franchising! This is a combination of high population / low relative interest states California, New York, Illinois, and Pennsylvania as well as high interest states Texas, Florida, Georgia, and North Carolina.
This analysis represents two different types of interest in franchises, relative and absolute interest. For the purposes of simplification, any reference to simple “interest” is actually a reference to relative interest.
Absolute interest is simply a breakdown of the total number of leads that FranchiseHelp has generated irrespective of the population of the geography in question.
Relative interest is a comparison of the number of leads that FranchiseHelp has generated compared the population of that given geography. The formula looks like (Percentage of Total Leads – Percentage of U.S. Population) / Percentage of U.S. Population.
As an example, let’s look at the state of California. As far as absolute interest, California represents 10.0% of all the lead generated by FranchiseHelp. (It ranks 2nd behind Texas.) With regard to relative interest, this number is compared to the fact that California has 12.2% of the U.S. population. Therefore, the relative interest is (10.0 – 12.2) / 12.2 = -18%.
The breakdown of leads generated comes from FranchiseHelp’s proprietary data. State populations are from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2015 population estimates found here.
FranchiseHelp Lead Generation Resource Center -- Learn everything there is to know about how online lead generation is successfully done for your franchise.
Any questions, clarifications, or comments, feel free to shoot us a note. We’d love to hear from you.
If you’re a member of the media and interested in the full data set or other information regarding the United States of Franchising, submit a request here and we’ll get back to you ASAP.
Eli Robinson and Tim Gilboy contributed to this report. Eli is the COO of FranchiseHelp’s parent company, Metric Collective. Tim is the General Manager of FranchiseHelp.
Text Message Copy Testing – We Finally Did It
In the past we’ve written about how important the concept of continuous innovation is to the technology business. Other industries may have the luxury of resting on yesterday’s solutions, but the technology sector moves too fast to ever have that attitude and succeed.
Text Messaging Is Absolutely Eating Phone Call's Lunch
Before we get to our newest findings, I wanted to give everyone a quick update on the information that we found back in May. To that point, we reported that when given the choice between verifying their information via text message and verifying their information via telephone, that almost 90% chose text message.
Don’t Click on My Ad! The Paradox of Free Branding
Text ads in LinkedIn appear in a few different places; at the top of the page or on the right rail. Even though they are far less likely to be clicked than sponsored posts, the payment and ad serving mechanism is the same for both ad types. You choose a bid per click and you pay that bid every time a user clicks on one of your ads. The frequency with which your ad is shown is based on the value of your bid relative to bids of other advertisers targeting the same audience.